Handling of "non-full" PeriodIndex #1114

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Closed

wesm opened this issue Apr 23, 2012 · 1 comment

Assignees

Labels

Datetime Enhancement

Milestone

Member

wesm commented Apr 23, 2012

scikits.timeseries notions of fill_missing_dates, duplicates possible, etc. Little to no testing in this regard

ghost assigned wesm

Member Author

wesm commented May 3, 2012

Maybe makes sense to add an API function here that fills a time series relative to a passed frequency (timestamps) or fills a PeriodIndex'd series

wesm added a commit that referenced this issue


          TST: test resample functions as fill_missing values, #1114

aa620c8

wesm closed this as completed in

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment