handle case where additionalRef is a ref (fixes #345)

[atlefren]

Fixes #345

As stated in the comment, the functionality in getAdditionalPropertiesType could perhaps be added in nodeType, but then I had to pass in the rawDefinition there, and risk messing up things.

This seems to work, added a new tests based on the inut in #345, both this and all old tests pass

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #383 (3d247c5) into main (e73e0d3) will increase coverage by 0.60%.
The diff coverage is 88.88%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #383      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   92.91%   93.51%   +0.60%     
==========================================
  Files           5        5              
  Lines         268      262       -6     
  Branches       90       84       -6     
==========================================
- Hits          249      245       -4     
  Misses         13       13              
+ Partials        6        4       -2     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/index.ts	81.81% <50.00%> (ø)
src/property-mapper.ts	84.21% <50.00%> (ø)
src/v2.ts	85.71% <90.90%> (+1.99%)	⬆️
src/v3.ts	96.85% <92.30%> (+0.58%)	⬆️
src/utils.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 135a93b...3d247c5. Read the comment docs.

[atlefren]

Not completely sure how codecov calculates coverage on my patch and what I can do to improve it, as I cannot find an easy way to run codecov patch locally?

[drwpow]

Not completely sure how codecov calculates coverage on my patch and what I can do to improve it, as I cannot find an easy way to run codecov patch locally?

Yeah I personally have never benefitted much from paying attention to the patch coverage; maybe it’s a project-level setting that I need to disable. Sorry about that! But I would just ignore that.

[drwpow]

This looks great, thank you!

[atlefren]

Great, any plans for a release soon? This was kind of a deal-breaker for us, we're using a local copy based on this PR for now, but would like to get back to the original library as fast as possible.

[drwpow]

Great, any plans for a release soon?

Yes actually 3.0.0-rc.0 is released due to #381. It’s probably not a huge breading change for people, but wanted to play it safe. Would love to know if that works well for you and everyone else, and if so we can cut a 3.0.0 release