fix: Remove spurious field_dict.update({}) for types without properties #969
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
dbanty
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 20, 2024
This PR was created by Knope. Merging it will create a new release
### Fixes
#### Remove spurious field_dict.update({}) for types without properties
(#969)
#### Fix invalid type check for nested unions
Nested union types (unions of unions) were generating `isinstance()`
checks that were not valid (at least for Python 3.9).
Thanks to @codebutler for PR #959 which fixes #958 and #967.
Co-authored-by: GitHub <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.