ecosystem: remove 3D viz from domains? #318
Conversation
It's redundant to have 3D visualizations in scientific domains while there is a visualization tab (with a link to the comprehensive <https://pyviz.org>).
|
Also for consistency, as we don't have Machine Learning and Data Science in domains. |
|
Fair enough, I agree that's better to remove. I had hoped that this would also make the spacing look better, because there's now seven entries in each row. It makes it look a bit worse though, on the left side:
I think that would be good to fix before merging this. I don't really know right now what changes are needed for that; if you do that would be great, otherwise I can look into it later. |
|
Well spotted. I think aligning topics vertically would be best, and the simplest fix would be to merge both rows in a single table. A downside is that there'll have to be holes if the number of topics is not even. I can do it if you agree that's the way to go. |
|
|
|
Sorry for the horrible delay in merging this @mdeff. I kind of ran out of time for working on the website. Christmas holiday allowed me to finally catch up with 2020 events. |
|
No problem @rgommers, you're doing a fantastic job. |
It's redundant to have 3D visualizations in scientific domains while there is a visualization tab (with a link to the comprehensive https://pyviz.org).