forked from rust-lang/rust
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 48
Modify commitee TOML and workflow #67
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from 12 commits
Commits
Show all changes
19 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
0568983
modify pr workflow
jaisnan 2c323e1
add dummy account to toml for testing
jaisnan a25a449
add workflow
jaisnan d31df34
remove extra console log
jaisnan aae2423
check with one
jaisnan ceb21e7
remove duplicate logic
jaisnan 3f530a4
add @carolynzech to approvers list for testing
jaisnan 0fd93bf
Revert requirement back to 1
jaisnan 233661d
Change approvers to 2
jaisnan 22e770b
resolve conflict
jaisnan 1f6eceb
merge from main
jaisnan ff9ff58
Merge branch 'main' into modify-2
jaisnan 5ac231e
remove github createa
jaisnan 257f8bb
Merge branch 'modify-2' of https://github.com/jaisnan/rust-dev into m…
jaisnan 6cac23c
update trigger condition
jaisnan b079d37
Re-run on pull and approval as well
jaisnan efc68d0
try with edited pull_request trigger
jaisnan 9557879
add push paths as well
jaisnan d3c3e51
Merge branch 'main' into modify-2
zhassan-aws File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -10,5 +10,6 @@ members = [ | |
"qinheping", | ||
"tautschnig", | ||
"jaisnan", | ||
"patricklam" | ||
"patricklam", | ||
"carolynzech", | ||
] |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Have you considered the business logic to a script instead of hard coding it in here? I think it is usually much easier to debug and run it locally. For example, you could create a script that takes as an argument a list of logins and the script succeeds if and only if the minimum number of people in the committee has been achieved.
Or the script output the number of people from the committee from that list and you only check here if the number is >= minimum requirement.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for that idea! I shall move the logic to its own script ad use gh command line to try and rerun old failing checks.