-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 159
Migrate to k8s integration tests to kubetest #349
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Migrate to k8s integration tests to kubetest #349
Conversation
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: davidz627 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
5a2e8ca
to
6e1cd9d
Compare
/test pull-gcp-compute-persistent-disk-csi-driver-kubernetes-integration |
We lost the summary of each test case in the output: https://prow.k8s.io/view/gcs/kubernetes-jenkins/pr-logs/pull/sigs.k8s.io_gcp-compute-persistent-disk-csi-driver/349/pull-gcp-compute-persistent-disk-csi-driver-kubernetes-integration/1151641109189890048/ |
test/k8s-integration/main.go
Outdated
if err != nil { | ||
return err | ||
} | ||
|
||
homeDir, _ := os.LookupEnv("HOME") | ||
os.Setenv("KUBECONFIG", filepath.Join(homeDir, ".kube/config")) | ||
|
||
artifactsDir, _ := os.LookupEnv("ARTIFACTS") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We still need reportArg
…ceties that I think will fix a lot of GCE config issues
6e1cd9d
to
5831038
Compare
/retest |
/lgtm |
/kind cleanup
/kind failing-test
/assign @msau42 @hantaowang
Alright this should just fix a bunch of stuff. Once it's done and stable I think there are a bunch of flags we can probably remove that were put in to work around the fact we weren't using kubetest :(