Skip to content

Remove cross validation of access modes, multiple access modes can be specified that represent all the capabilities of the volume #289

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

davidz627
Copy link
Contributor

@davidz627 davidz627 commented Jun 6, 2019

/assign @msau42 @saad-ali

Needs to be cherry-picked to release-0.5.0 and new release version to be cut.

Also we should identify why none of the tests specify more than one access mode...

/kind bug

Remove cross validation of access modes, multiple access modes can be specified that represent all the capabilities of the volume

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Jun 6, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: davidz627

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 6, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested review from msau42 and saad-ali June 6, 2019 00:55
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jun 6, 2019
@davidz627 davidz627 force-pushed the fix/validateAccessModes branch from 6d11056 to cbb0e03 Compare June 6, 2019 00:59
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jun 6, 2019
@davidz627
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold
for #291

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 6, 2019
@msau42
Copy link
Contributor

msau42 commented Jun 6, 2019

Should we add an e2e test with multiple access modes?

@msau42
Copy link
Contributor

msau42 commented Jun 6, 2019

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 6, 2019
@davidz627
Copy link
Contributor Author

@msau42 there are now unit tests with multiple access modes. K8s has e2e tests with multiple access modes that are not in the external test suites (yet, I assume)

@davidz627
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold cancel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 6, 2019
@msau42
Copy link
Contributor

msau42 commented Jun 6, 2019

Do you think it is a valuable test case to add to the k8s external test suite?

… specified that represent all the capabilities of the volume
@davidz627 davidz627 force-pushed the fix/validateAccessModes branch from cbb0e03 to 3d6be58 Compare June 6, 2019 19:12
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 6, 2019
@msau42
Copy link
Contributor

msau42 commented Jun 6, 2019

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 6, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 3fdcd8b into kubernetes-sigs:master Jun 6, 2019
@davidz627 davidz627 deleted the fix/validateAccessModes branch June 6, 2019 23:20
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. labels Oct 11, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants