Skip to content

[release-1.17] Add Labels Override for Gen3/Gen4 VMs #2108

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

sunnylovestiramisu
Copy link
Contributor

What type of PR is this?
/kind feature

What this PR does / why we need it:
Manual cherry-pick for the attach limit override feature, including #2072 and #2092.

To not break customers on PD, we decided to still use the PD attach limit instead of the Hyperdisk one.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

Add Labels Override for Gen3/Gen4 VMs

…hLimit

Adjust Attach Limits for Gen3 Machines + Add Labels Override
…hLimit

Using Default PD Attach Limit for Gen3 Machines
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Jun 5, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jun 5, 2025
@sunnylovestiramisu
Copy link
Contributor Author

/assign @mattcary

@sunnylovestiramisu sunnylovestiramisu changed the title [Release-1.17] Add Labels Override for Gen3/Gen4 VMs [release-1.17] Add Labels Override for Gen3/Gen4 VMs Jun 5, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@sunnylovestiramisu: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
pull-gcp-compute-persistent-disk-csi-driver-e2e-windows-2022 16a57d4 link false /test pull-gcp-compute-persistent-disk-csi-driver-e2e-windows-2022
pull-gcp-compute-persistent-disk-csi-driver-e2e-windows-2019 16a57d4 link false /test pull-gcp-compute-persistent-disk-csi-driver-e2e-windows-2019

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@mattcary
Copy link
Contributor

mattcary commented Jun 5, 2025

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 5, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mattcary, sunnylovestiramisu

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [mattcary,sunnylovestiramisu]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 3db8137 into kubernetes-sigs:release-1.17 Jun 5, 2025
7 of 9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants