Skip to content

Update validation logic for Data Cache to distinguish user and non-us… #1960

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

hungnguyen243
Copy link
Contributor

@hungnguyen243 hungnguyen243 commented Feb 26, 2025

…er errors when RAIDing fails

What type of PR is this?

Uncomment only one /kind <> line, hit enter to put that in a new line, and remove leading whitespaces from that line:

/kind api-change
/kind bug
/kind cleanup
/kind design
/kind documentation
/kind failing-test

/kind feature

/kind flake

What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR updates the pre-setupCaching validation step for Data Cache to distinguish between non-user and user errors (incorrect node pool configuration) to return appropriate error codes, so that we won't have false positives for SLO alerts.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

Update validation logic for Data Cache to distinguish user and non-user errors when RAIDing fails

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Feb 26, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Feb 26, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @hungnguyen243. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Feb 26, 2025
@Sneha-at
Copy link
Contributor

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Feb 26, 2025
if ns.DataCacheEnabledNodePool {
return nil, status.Error(codes.DataLoss, fmt.Sprintf("Error validate configuration for Data Cache: %v", configError.Error()))
}
return nil, status.Error(codes.InvalidArgument, fmt.Sprintf("Data Cache PVC is requested for an incompatible node pool: %v", configError.Error()))
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"The Data Cache PVC is scheduled on an incompatible node pool. Please select a node pool with data cache configured." So the users know what action to take.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Feb 27, 2025
@hungnguyen243 hungnguyen243 force-pushed the dataCacheValidationPatch branch from 56e6253 to 4dc330e Compare February 27, 2025 06:11
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Feb 27, 2025
@hungnguyen243
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest-required

@sunnylovestiramisu
Copy link
Contributor

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: hungnguyen243, sunnylovestiramisu

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 27, 2025
@hungnguyen243
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest-required

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

k8s-ci-robot commented Feb 27, 2025

@hungnguyen243: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
pull-gcp-compute-persistent-disk-csi-driver-e2e-windows-2019 508ebbd link false /test pull-gcp-compute-persistent-disk-csi-driver-e2e-windows-2019

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@sunnylovestiramisu
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 27, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 10b737f into kubernetes-sigs:master Feb 27, 2025
7 of 8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants