generated from kubernetes/kubernetes-template-project
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 91
Reduced GPU requirements #272
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
anshuman-agarwala
wants to merge
1
commit into
kubernetes-sigs:main
from
anshuman-agarwala:gpu-req-reduction
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
with only 1 replica you cannot really see the benefits of the request scheduling algorithms. let's keep 3?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Big plus 1 here. While I understand the desire to minimize the accelerator footprint of a getting started guide. Someone interested in an inference-tailored scheduling tool will have access to multiple accelerators to test this.
We should add comments clarifying why we are reducing the max-loras also. (L4s need this, but A100/H100s can go higher)
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree with ^. However, we need a simple mechanism, e.g. kustomize, to allow users to change the default
3
to1
or any other value. I've been using1
in my test/dev env and can at least see the LoRA load balancing for my single node kind cluster. For example, create akustomization.yaml
file inpkg/manifests/vllm/
:Run
kubectl apply -k pkg/manifests/vllm/
and the vllm deployment will be run with 1 replica.