-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 91
Richer prom metrics #306
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
/assign @JeffLuoo |
@kfswain: GitHub didn't allow me to assign the following users: JeffLuoo. Note that only kubernetes-sigs members with read permissions, repo collaborators and people who have commented on this issue/PR can be assigned. Additionally, issues/PRs can only have 10 assignees at the same time. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@JeffLuoo if you dont mind saying hello here, we can get this assigned to ya |
Can you provide some examples of what metrics we want to aggregate on inferencePool level? Do you have any proposal for it I can review? Thanks. |
This issue was created from a PR of yours, at your request, the comment should have all the context |
I see, thanks. cc: @raywainman @smarterclayton |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues. This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
What would you like to be added: We would like richer, unaggregated inferencePool metrics to allow the user to perform their own aggregations
Why is this needed: the necessity is discussed here https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/gateway-api-inference-extension/pull/304/files#r1947016924
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: