Skip to content

Update CAPIBM PowerVS resources Status fields to adopt to CAPI v1beta2 changes #2264

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
Karthik-K-N opened this issue Mar 21, 2025 · 5 comments · Fixed by #2272 · May be fixed by #2312
Open

Update CAPIBM PowerVS resources Status fields to adopt to CAPI v1beta2 changes #2264

Karthik-K-N opened this issue Mar 21, 2025 · 5 comments · Fixed by #2272 · May be fixed by #2312
Assignees
Labels
area/provider/ibmcloud Issues or PRs related to ibmcloud provider kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature.
Milestone

Comments

@Karthik-K-N
Copy link
Contributor

/kind feature
/area provider/ibmcloud

User Story

What would you like to be added?

CAPI is planning for v1beta2 and there are significant enhancement in status field, We need to update status subresource to adopt to the same

We can start with updating for IBMPowerVS resources to begin with.

More information it can be found in this enhancement: https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api/blob/main/docs/proposals/20240916-improve-status-in-CAPI-resources.md

Example: "As a [developer/user/operator], I would like to [high-level description] for [reasons]."

Detailed Feature Description

Provide a clear and concise description of the new feature or the improvement to an existing feature.

Context & Motivation

What problem does this solve, and why is it important?
Explain the motivation behind this request. How does this feature improve the project? What specific use cases does it address?

Proposed Solution

How should this be implemented?
Describe potential approaches for implementing this feature. If possible, provide links to related documentation or prior discussions.

Alternatives Considered

Have you considered any alternatives?
List any alternative solutions or workarounds you've considered and explain why they may or may not be suitable.

Additional Information

Anything else you would like to add?
Include screenshots, references, or additional context that can assist in understanding and implementing the request.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. area/provider/ibmcloud Issues or PRs related to ibmcloud provider labels Mar 21, 2025
@Karthik-K-N
Copy link
Contributor Author

/assign

@mkumatag
Copy link
Member

@Karthik-K-N when you want to target this? this 0.11(current release) or next?

@Karthik-K-N
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Karthik-K-N when you want to target this? this 0.11(current release) or next?

I think if we want to cover all the resources(PowerVS and VPC), It may move to next release.
I just started with IBMPowerVSMachine followed by IBMPowerVSCluster which can go in this release.

@Karthik-K-N
Copy link
Contributor Author

Need to implement same for other resources as well.
/reopen

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot reopened this Apr 8, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@Karthik-K-N: Reopened this issue.

In response to this:

Need to implement same for other resources as well.
/reopen

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment