Skip to content

Fix CRD contract version label #329

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 23, 2024

Conversation

hrak
Copy link
Contributor

@hrak hrak commented Dec 12, 2023

Issue #, if available:

Description of changes:

This PR fixes the CRD contract version label that was incorrectly defined, since there is no CAPI API v1beta2 yet.

It also makes sure automatic conversions between the CAPC api versions can take place.

Reference: https://release-0-3.cluster-api.sigs.k8s.io/developer/providers/v1alpha2-to-v1alpha3.html#apply-the-contract-version-label-clusterx-k8sioversion-version1_version2_version3-to-your-crds

Testing performed:

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Dec 12, 2023

Deploy Preview for kubernetes-sigs-cluster-api-cloudstack ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit cb664d7
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/kubernetes-sigs-cluster-api-cloudstack/deploys/657878be2b0ea500087ece74
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-329--kubernetes-sigs-cluster-api-cloudstack.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Dec 12, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @hrak. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Dec 12, 2023
@rohityadavcloud
Copy link
Member

/lgtm
/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Jan 3, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 3, 2024
@rohityadavcloud
Copy link
Member

/run-e2e -c 4.18

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@rohityadavcloud a jenkins job has been kicked to run test with following paramaters:

  • kubernetes version: 1.27.2
  • CloudStack version: 4.18
  • hypervisor: kvm
  • template: ubuntu-2004-kube
  • Kubernetes upgrade from: 1.26.5 to 1.27.2

@blueorangutan
Copy link

Test Results : (tid-356)
Environment: kvm Rocky8(x3), Advanced Networking with Management Server Rocky8
Kubernetes Version: v1.27.2
Kubernetes Version upgrade from: v1.26.5
Kubernetes Version upgrade to: v1.27.2
CloudStack Version: 4.18
Template: ubuntu-2004-kube
E2E Test Run Logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/capc-prs/releases/download/capc-pr-ci-cd/capc-e2e-artifacts-pr329-sl-356.zip

[PASS] When testing app deployment to the workload cluster [TC1][PR-Blocking] Should be able to download an HTML from the app deployed to the workload cluster
[PASS] When testing with disk offering Should successfully create a cluster with disk offering
[PASS] When testing machine remediation Should replace a machine when it is destroyed
[PASS] When testing MachineDeployment rolling upgrades Should successfully upgrade Machines upon changes in relevant MachineDeployment fields
[PASS] When testing multiple CPs in a shared network with kubevip Should successfully create a cluster with multiple CPs in a shared network
[PASS] When testing with custom disk offering Should successfully create a cluster with a custom disk offering
[PASS] When testing node drain timeout A node should be forcefully removed if it cannot be drained in time
[PASS] When testing horizontal scale out/in [TC17][TC18][TC20][TC21] Should successfully scale machine replicas up and down horizontally
[PASS] When testing affinity group Should have host affinity group when affinity is pro
[PASS] When testing affinity group Should have host affinity group when affinity is anti
[PASS] When testing subdomain Should create a cluster in a subdomain
[PASS] with two clusters should successfully add and remove a second cluster without breaking the first cluster
[PASS] When testing K8S conformance [Conformance] Should create a workload cluster and run kubetest


Summarizing 16 Failures:

[Fail] When testing Kubernetes version upgrades [It] Should successfully upgrade kubernetes versions when there is a change in relevant fields 
/root/go/pkg/mod/sigs.k8s.io/cluster-api/[email protected]/framework/cluster_helpers.go:143

[Fail] When testing app deployment to the workload cluster with slow network [ToxiProxy] [BeforeEach] Should be able to download an HTML from the app deployed to the workload cluster 
/jenkins/workspace/capc-e2e-new/test/e2e/toxiproxy/toxiProxy.go:203

[Fail] When the specified resource does not exist [It] Should fail due to the specified account is not found [TC4a] 
/jenkins/workspace/capc-e2e-new/test/e2e/invalid_resource.go:253

[Fail] When the specified resource does not exist [It] Should fail due to the specified domain is not found [TC4b] 
/jenkins/workspace/capc-e2e-new/test/e2e/invalid_resource.go:253

[Fail] When the specified resource does not exist [It] Should fail due to the specified control plane offering is not found [TC7] 
/jenkins/workspace/capc-e2e-new/test/e2e/invalid_resource.go:253

[Fail] When the specified resource does not exist [It] Should fail due to the specified template is not found [TC6] 
/jenkins/workspace/capc-e2e-new/test/e2e/invalid_resource.go:253

[Fail] When the specified resource does not exist [It] Should fail due to the specified zone is not found [TC3] 
/jenkins/workspace/capc-e2e-new/test/e2e/invalid_resource.go:253

[Fail] When the specified resource does not exist [It] Should fail due to the specified disk offering is not found 
/jenkins/workspace/capc-e2e-new/test/e2e/invalid_resource.go:253

[Fail] When the specified resource does not exist [It] Should fail due to the compute resources are not sufficient for the specified offering [TC8] 
/jenkins/workspace/capc-e2e-new/test/e2e/invalid_resource.go:253

[Fail] When the specified resource does not exist [It] Should fail due to the specified disk offer is not customized but the disk size is specified 
/jenkins/workspace/capc-e2e-new/test/e2e/invalid_resource.go:253

[Fail] When the specified resource does not exist [It] Should fail due to the specified disk offer is customized but the disk size is not specified 
/jenkins/workspace/capc-e2e-new/test/e2e/invalid_resource.go:253

[Fail] When the specified resource does not exist [It] Should fail due to the public IP can not be found 
/jenkins/workspace/capc-e2e-new/test/e2e/invalid_resource.go:253

[Fail] When the specified resource does not exist When starting with a healthy cluster [It] Should fail to upgrade worker machine due to insufficient compute resources 
/jenkins/workspace/capc-e2e-new/test/e2e/invalid_resource.go:253

[Fail] When the specified resource does not exist When starting with a healthy cluster [It] Should fail to upgrade control plane machine due to insufficient compute resources 
/jenkins/workspace/capc-e2e-new/test/e2e/invalid_resource.go:253

[Fail] When testing resource cleanup [AfterEach] Should create a new network when the specified network does not exist 
/jenkins/workspace/capc-e2e-new/test/e2e/resource_cleanup.go:101

[Fail] When testing app deployment to the workload cluster with network interruption [ToxiProxy] [BeforeEach] Should be able to create a cluster despite a network interruption during that process 
/jenkins/workspace/capc-e2e-new/test/e2e/toxiproxy/toxiProxy.go:203

Ran 28 of 29 Specs in 12124.306 seconds
FAIL! -- 12 Passed | 16 Failed | 0 Pending | 1 Skipped
--- FAIL: TestE2E (12124.32s)
FAIL

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Apr 2, 2024
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Close this PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels May 2, 2024
@hrak
Copy link
Contributor Author

hrak commented May 7, 2024

/remove-lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. label May 7, 2024
@vishesh92
Copy link
Member

/run-e2e -c 4.19

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@vishesh92 a jenkins job has been kicked to run test with following paramaters:

  • kubernetes version: 1.27.2
  • CloudStack version: 4.19
  • hypervisor: kvm
  • template: ubuntu-2004-kube
  • Kubernetes upgrade from: 1.26.5 to 1.27.2

@blueorangutan
Copy link

Setting up environment failed

@blueorangutan
Copy link

Test Results : (tid-403)
Environment: kvm Rocky8(x3), Advanced Networking with Management Server Rocky8
Kubernetes Version: v1.27.2
Kubernetes Version upgrade from: v1.26.5
Kubernetes Version upgrade to: v1.27.2
CloudStack Version: 4.19
Template: ubuntu-2004-kube
E2E Test Run Logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/capc-prs/releases/download/capc-pr-ci-cd/capc-e2e-artifacts-pr329-sl-403.zip



Summarizing 5 Failures:
 [FAIL] When testing Kubernetes version upgrades [It] Should successfully upgrade kubernetes versions when there is a change in relevant fields
 /root/go/pkg/mod/sigs.k8s.io/cluster-api/[email protected]/framework/machinedeployment_helpers.go:127
 [FAIL] When testing multiple CPs in a shared network with kubevip [It] Should successfully create a cluster with multiple CPs in a shared network
 /root/go/pkg/mod/sigs.k8s.io/cluster-api/[email protected]/framework/cluster_helpers.go:144
 [FAIL] When testing resource cleanup [AfterEach] Should create a new network when the specified network does not exist
 /jenkins/workspace/capc-e2e-new/test/e2e/resource_cleanup.go:101
 [FAIL] When testing affinity group [It] Should have host affinity group when affinity is pro
 /jenkins/workspace/capc-e2e-new/test/e2e/common.go:332
 [TIMEDOUT] When testing machine remediation [AfterEach] Should replace a machine when it is destroyed
 /jenkins/workspace/capc-e2e-new/test/e2e/machine_remediation.go:93

Ran 28 of 29 Specs in 10788.596 seconds
FAIL! - Suite Timeout Elapsed -- 23 Passed | 5 Failed | 0 Pending | 1 Skipped
--- FAIL: TestE2E (10788.60s)
FAIL

@blueorangutan
Copy link

Test Results : (tid-419)
Environment: kvm Rocky8(x3), Advanced Networking with Management Server Rocky8
Kubernetes Version: v1.27.2
Kubernetes Version upgrade from: v1.26.5
Kubernetes Version upgrade to: v1.27.2
CloudStack Version: 4.19
Template: ubuntu-2004-kube
E2E Test Run Logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/capc-prs/releases/download/capc-pr-ci-cd/capc-e2e-artifacts-pr329-sl-419.zip



Summarizing 2 Failures:
  [FAIL] When testing multiple CPs in a shared network with kubevip [It] Should successfully create a cluster with multiple CPs in a shared network
  /root/go/pkg/mod/sigs.k8s.io/cluster-api/[email protected]/framework/cluster_helpers.go:144
  [FAIL] When testing app deployment to the workload cluster [TC1][PR-Blocking] [It] Should be able to download an HTML from the app deployed to the workload cluster
  /jenkins/workspace/capc-e2e-new/test/e2e/deploy_app.go:109

Ran 28 of 29 Specs in 10272.413 seconds
FAIL! -- 26 Passed | 2 Failed | 0 Pending | 1 Skipped
--- FAIL: TestE2E (10272.41s)
FAIL

@vishesh92
Copy link
Member

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 23, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: hrak, vishesh92

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 32f342c into kubernetes-sigs:main May 23, 2024
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants