Skip to content

🌱 Update testing to use NLB for controlPlaneLoadBalancer #5338

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 11, 2025

Conversation

damdo
Copy link
Member

@damdo damdo commented Feb 7, 2025

What type of PR is this?
/kind support

What this PR does / why we need it:

Update testing to use NLB for controlPlaneLoadBalancer, as ELBs don't work with k8s >= 1.30

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):

Release note:

NONE

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. kind/support Categorizes issue or PR as a support question. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Feb 7, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-priority size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Feb 7, 2025
@damdo
Copy link
Member Author

damdo commented Feb 7, 2025

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-eks

@richardcase richardcase changed the title WIP: Update testing to use NLB for controlPlaneLoadBalancer 🌱 WIP: Update testing to use NLB for controlPlaneLoadBalancer Feb 7, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Feb 7, 2025
@richardcase richardcase changed the title 🌱 WIP: Update testing to use NLB for controlPlaneLoadBalancer WIP: 🌱 Update testing to use NLB for controlPlaneLoadBalancer Feb 7, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Feb 7, 2025
@damdo
Copy link
Member Author

damdo commented Feb 7, 2025

/assign @nrb @richardcase

@damdo damdo changed the title WIP: 🌱 Update testing to use NLB for controlPlaneLoadBalancer 🌱 Update testing to use NLB for controlPlaneLoadBalancer Feb 7, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Feb 7, 2025
@damdo
Copy link
Member Author

damdo commented Feb 7, 2025

E2Es are passing with this change.

Copy link
Member

@richardcase richardcase left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

Thanks @damdo .

It would then be good to update all the non-eks templates (in /templates) with the same configuration

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: richardcase

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 7, 2025
@AndiDog
Copy link
Contributor

AndiDog commented Feb 10, 2025

Have we discussed to set the default to NLB in the future? If so, I'm fine with these kind of changes. I remember we discussed that some migration path would be needed.

@nrb
Copy link
Contributor

nrb commented Feb 10, 2025

Have we discussed to set the default to NLB in the future?

Yes, we'll begin the deprecation notification cycle for changing the default type of NLB with v2.8's release. The plan was outlined in this comment

@Ankitasw
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 11, 2025
@damdo
Copy link
Member Author

damdo commented Feb 11, 2025

/hold

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 11, 2025
@damdo
Copy link
Member Author

damdo commented Feb 11, 2025

/unhold

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 11, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 43e4597 into kubernetes-sigs:main Feb 11, 2025
36 of 38 checks passed
@damdo
Copy link
Member Author

damdo commented Feb 11, 2025

Thanks @damdo .
It would then be good to update all the non-eks templates (in /templates) with the same configuration

@richardcase I put up #5345 for that

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/support Categorizes issue or PR as a support question. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-priority release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants