Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Dec 6, 2024. It is now read-only.

BAC should not have provisioner field #29

Closed
krishchow opened this issue Mar 22, 2021 · 0 comments
Closed

BAC should not have provisioner field #29

krishchow opened this issue Mar 22, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@krishchow
Copy link

The provisioner field should be removed from the BAC since it is not relevant.

cc @wlan0
@wlan0 wlan0 mentioned this issue Mar 24, 2021
Merged
@wlan0 wlan0 closed this as completed Mar 25, 2021
shanduur pushed a commit to shanduur/container-object-storage-interface-api that referenced this issue Jun 6, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Merge pull request kubernetes-retired#29 from rrati/bucket-context-ni…
e354c37 
…l-fix

Fix handling of nil parameters in B and BA
BlaineEXE pushed a commit to BlaineEXE/cosi-api that referenced this issue Jun 14, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Merge pull request kubernetes-retired#29 from rrati/bucket-context-ni…
64d9a87 
…l-fix

Fix handling of nil parameters in B and BA
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@wlan0 @krishchow