This repository was archived by the owner on Jul 30, 2021. It is now read-only.
generated from kubernetes/kubernetes-template-project
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 65
🐛 Test and logic fixes #211
Merged
k8s-ci-robot
merged 1 commit into
kubernetes-retired:master
from
chuckha:more-test-cleanup
Sep 9, 2019
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
IMO this piece of code should be moved into
reconcileDiscovery
, so all the logics impactionJoinConfiguration.Discovery
are in the same place.Nb. the bit of code for creating
BootstrapToken
if nil is already implemented there as wellUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think it makes sense to add this check to
reconcileDiscovery
unless you are also suggesting to add certificates into thereconcileDiscovery
method. We look up certificates to see if we have a CACertHash to use. If we do thenreconcileDiscovery
does something different than if it didn't have a CACertHash. ThereforereconcileDiscovery
depends on looking up certificates. Either certificates becomes part ofreconcileDiscovery
or we will have to live with not all defaults ending up inreconcileDiscovery
If we want to refactor it that's fine but I think that's out of scope for this PR.