Skip to content

API change for v6.0.0b1 #477

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 9, 2018
Merged

Conversation

roycaihw
Copy link
Member

@roycaihw roycaihw commented Mar 9, 2018

Committing generated API change for v6.0.0b1:

  • add PATCH to custom_objects_api
  • documentation update: never let cluster-scoped resources skip webhooks

also updating README and CHANGELOG

roycaihw added 2 commits March 9, 2018 11:09
add PATCH to custom_objects_api
documentation update: never let cluster-scoped resources skip webhooks
# v6.0.0b1
- Update to Kubernetes 1.10 cluster
- New API: add PATCH to CustomObjectsApi [kubernetes-client/gen#53](https://github.com/kubernetes-client/gen/pull/53)
- Documentation update: never let cluster-scoped resources skip webhooks [kubernetes/kubernetes#58185](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/58185)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just curious, are you manually generating this? I would be beneficial to all clients if we can automate this. I would create a tracking issue in gen repo for it.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, I manually checked the diff and tracked down the original PRs. It would help a lot if gen could detect the openapi spec change since last time we generated the client

@mbohlool mbohlool merged commit 1267667 into kubernetes-client:master Mar 9, 2018
@roycaihw roycaihw deleted the apichange-6.0 branch March 9, 2018 19:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants