-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.3k
Adding Power support(ppc64le) with ci and testing to the project for architecture independent #1337
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
…architecture independent
Thanks for your pull request. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA). 📝 Please follow instructions at https://git.k8s.io/community/CLA.md#the-contributor-license-agreement to sign the CLA. It may take a couple minutes for the CLA signature to be fully registered; after that, please reply here with a new comment and we'll verify. Thanks.
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
Welcome @asellappen! |
please sign cla |
@asellappen go ahead and sign the CLA - if you have questions on it, send me email separately (or ask @seth-priya for guidance as she has some experience here). |
CLA signature has been done ,Please kindly review. |
/lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: asellappen, yliaog The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
I am working for IBM to port cpu arch ppc64le for open sources.
This PR adds CI support for the IBM Power Little Endian (ppc64le) architecture. The idea is to ensure that the builds on this architecture are continuously tested along with the Intel builds (amd64) as this is part of the ubuntu distro
on that architecture as well and detecting (and fixing) any issues or failures early would help to ensure that we are always up to date.
This helps us simplify testing later when distributions are re-building and re-releasing,We typically build applications for customers and
ISVs, and while we don't use this package directly,we do count on all of the packages in debian/ubuntu to build other packages. So we more likely have this as a second or
third level dependency and couldn't tell you explicitly which features we use or our usage model,For more info tag @gerrith3.
Please help to verify and merge.