Skip to content

ConfigExceptions aren't made visible #2219

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
merval opened this issue Apr 12, 2024 · 7 comments
Closed

ConfigExceptions aren't made visible #2219

merval opened this issue Apr 12, 2024 · 7 comments
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.

Comments

@merval
Copy link

merval commented Apr 12, 2024

What is the feature and why do you need it:
When loading the kube config, if any ConfigException is thrown it's caught and simply printed as an error message. This prevents any action being taken by the user when the exception is thrown. It also doesn't halt the application, which causes cascading errors.

Describe the solution you'd like to see:
Very simple fix:

except Exception as e:
logging.error(str(e))

Should be:

except ConfigException as e:
    raise ConfigException(e)
except Exception as e:
    logging.error(str(e))
@merval merval added the kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. label Apr 12, 2024
@roycaihw
Copy link
Member

The behavior is specific to exec plugin and was introduced in kubernetes-client/python-base#75. Here is some context: kubernetes-client/python-base#75 (comment). The reason was to give a chance to other auth methods.

@yliaog Do you have concerns with the proposal?

If we change the behavior, we should document it in the release notes in case people are depending on the behavior.

@yliaog
Copy link
Contributor

yliaog commented Apr 24, 2024

I think the reason (give a chance to other auth methods) is still valid, what do you think @merval ?

@merval
Copy link
Author

merval commented Apr 24, 2024

Yeah, that seems valid. In my case the ConfigException is thrown because the token is expired. I wonder of there should be a mechanism to raise the ConfigException if all other authentication methods fail.

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jul 23, 2024
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Aug 23, 2024
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Reopen this issue with /reopen
  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/close not-planned

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@k8s-triage-robot: Closing this issue, marking it as "Not Planned".

In response to this:

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Reopen this issue with /reopen
  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/close not-planned

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Sep 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants