Clarify what "absolute" means for keyword absolute location #999
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
It is like absolute filesystem paths, not like absolute-URI from RFC 3986. In fact, an absolute keyword location can never be an RFC 3986 absolute-URI because a fragment must always be present to identify the keyword.
handrews
changed the title
Relequestual
approved these changes
Sep 30, 2020
|
extremely minor nit - the absoluteKeywordLocation for the error generated by the schema (That's the only time this can happen, I believe, except for implementation-specific errors generated outside of keyword evaluation.. for example hitting a maximum recursion limit right after an |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It is like absolute filesystem paths, not like absolute-URI
from RFC 3986. In fact, an absolute keyword location can
never be an RFC 3986 absolute-URI because a fragment must always
be present to identify the keyword.
NOTE: this PR is not for any discussion of renaming fields in the output format, since someone always wants to rename something. If you want to rename something, get consensus around it and file it as a new issue/PR. Do not raise it here.