-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 215
Update the test schema to Draft 2020, and fix a bug in it. #565
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we add an enum property to the test files, we could probably key off of that and enforce a specific metaschema here. (Idea for separate PR)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As in provide some other mechanism for indicating a metaschema test? We could, but each of these changes is delicate, since someone's existing test runner still may not be expecting that. Obviously we're going to need to do something like breaking our informal backwards compatibility anyhow to resolve the
optional/
folder situation, so we could in theory do so for that too, but lemme know if I misunderstood the idea entirely.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, I mean actually validate the schemas in the test files. If the test file specifies what version schemas its for (because JSON Schema does see the file path) then we can use that to select a metaschema to validate the test schema against.
I was thinking something like the below, but then I realized the test file is an array, and you'd have to specify the version on every test... Might be more headache than it's worth now that I see it.
Leaving for posterity
In the test file
In the above schema: