-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 125
Faster dataframe construction #128
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
51a7fb2
push df construction to pandas
max-sixty 61a429b
lint
max-sixty fec6dc6
gitignore additions
max-sixty 59dfb01
`.astype` conversion
max-sixty bb4321c
Merge branch 'master' into no-python-loop
max-sixty a028e1d
Merge branch 'master' into no-python-loop
max-sixty bb68875
ignore warnings from Google Cloud SDK auth
max-sixty acfac47
handle repeated fields in schema
max-sixty 87531a0
remove comment
max-sixty 5641fc3
whats new
max-sixty 729b9f3
remove duplicate test
max-sixty File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -69,6 +69,8 @@ dist | |
**/wheelhouse/* | ||
# coverage | ||
.coverage | ||
.testmondata | ||
.pytest_cache | ||
.nox | ||
|
||
# OS generated files # | ||
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we even need the
astype
? I recall that when I dropped it last time I encountered #174. A behavior change like that would require a version bump, though, so I'm happy with keeping this a 0.6.1 release if you'd prefer to get this out as-is.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's a good point re
int
with nulls. I'll add a test and see what happens.I think we do need this for dates; otherwise they'll be
str
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually there's already a test: https://github.com/max-sixty/pandas-gbq/blob/no-python-loop/tests/system/test_gbq.py#L165
What's happening: pandas is ignoring setting a column with
NaN
toint
, and keeping it as object