Skip to content

Bug/fix skip dirs #327

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 22, 2018
Merged

Bug/fix skip dirs #327

merged 2 commits into from
Dec 22, 2018

Conversation

jirfag
Copy link
Contributor

@jirfag jirfag commented Dec 22, 2018

No description provided.

sean- and others added 2 commits December 5, 2018 22:02
Prior to this change the SkipDir runner was not skipping files such as
`foo/bar/baz.go` with a `skip-dir` entry of `foo/bar` when the `run`
command was invoked with an argument of `foo/...`.  This is both a
surprising and problematic behavior change.

The pathology was:

1. `shouldPassIssue()` was receiving an input like `foo/bar/baz.go`
2. `shouldPassIssue()` would call `p.getLongestArgRelativeIssuePath()`
   which was returning `bar`, not `foo/bar` as expected.
3. The reason for this was because inside of
   `getLongestArgRelativeIssuePath()` it was trimming the prefix that
   matched the path prefix (e.g. `foo/`).

If you have the file structure:

  - foo/bar/baz.go
  - bur/bar/baz.go

There is no way to isolate `foo/bar` from `bur/baz` without strictly
controlling both your `skip-dirs` configuration and the arguments to
`run`.

The rest of the logic to skip files that don't match `run`'s argument
is valid, however the regexp should be evaluated based on the
`filepath.Dir()` of the input (e.g. `foo/bar`) and not the truncated
version of the issue's filepath.

Fixes: #301
@jirfag jirfag mentioned this pull request Dec 22, 2018
@jirfag jirfag merged commit 7dfb9cf into master Dec 22, 2018
@jirfag jirfag deleted the bug/fix-skip-dirs branch December 22, 2018 09:24
@ldez ldez added this to the v1.12 milestone Mar 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants