Skip to content

Using upstream dupl #1552

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Using upstream dupl #1552

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

iwankgb
Copy link
Contributor

@iwankgb iwankgb commented Dec 12, 2020

Fixes #1551.
See: mibk/dupl#18.

@iwankgb iwankgb added the forks We shall not use forks of linters label Dec 12, 2020
@iwankgb iwankgb requested a review from a team December 12, 2020 18:40
@iwankgb iwankgb self-assigned this Dec 12, 2020
@iwankgb iwankgb marked this pull request as draft December 12, 2020 18:40
Copy link
Contributor

@Nivl Nivl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

My main concern here is that we're not removing a fork, we're switching from our own (outdated) fork to yours.

I think we should wait for mibk/dupl#18 to get merged upstream before doing anything (which might be the reason why you put the PR back as Draft after requesting a review?).

@iwankgb
Copy link
Contributor Author

iwankgb commented Dec 13, 2020

@Nivl, yes this is why PR is in draft. If the dupl PR is not merged then there is no point in swapping a fork for another one :)

@SVilgelm SVilgelm added the blocked Need's direct action from maintainer label Feb 14, 2021
@ldez
Copy link
Member

ldez commented Mar 31, 2022

I will close this PR for now because #1551 already tracks this topic.

And the PR mibk/dupl#18 is opened for more than a year.

@ldez ldez closed this Mar 31, 2022
@ldez ldez deleted the upstream_dupl branch March 31, 2022 23:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
blocked Need's direct action from maintainer forks We shall not use forks of linters
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

We shall not use fork of mibk/dupl
4 participants