Skip to content

Added clarity to license statement in README #280

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 26, 2014
Merged

Added clarity to license statement in README #280

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
32d2af8
Added clarity regarding when you must publish the source code of any …
hyandell Sep 26, 2014
e51de99
Adding my name to authors; though I suspect my change had little if a…
hyandell Sep 26, 2014
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions AUTHORS
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ DisposaBoy <disposaboy at dby.me>
Frederick Mayle <frederickmayle at gmail.com>
Gustavo Kristic <gkristic at gmail.com>
Hanno Braun <mail at hannobraun.com>
Henri Yandell <flamefew at gmail.com>
James Harr <james.harr at gmail.com>
Jian Zhen <zhenjl at gmail.com>
Julien Schmidt <go-sql-driver at julienschmidt.com>
Expand Down
6 changes: 3 additions & 3 deletions README.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -334,9 +334,9 @@ Mozilla summarizes the license scope as follows:


That means:
* You can **use** the **unchanged** source code both in private as also commercial
* You **needn't publish** the source code of your library as long the files licensed under the MPL 2.0 are **unchanged**
* You **must publish** the source code of any **changed files** licensed under the MPL 2.0 under a) the MPL 2.0 itself or b) a compatible license (e.g. GPL 3.0 or Apache License 2.0)
* You can **use** the **unchanged** source code both in private and commercially
* When distributing, you **must publish** the source code of any **changed files** licensed under the MPL 2.0 under a) the MPL 2.0 itself or b) a compatible license (e.g. GPL 3.0 or Apache License 2.0)
* You **needn't publish** the source code of your library as long as the files licensed under the MPL 2.0 are **unchanged**

Please read the [MPL 2.0 FAQ](http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/FAQ.html) if you have further questions regarding the license.

Expand Down