-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 930
Ignore IndexedDB failure during lease refresh #3020
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why is proceeding here assuming we're the primary a useful thing?
When this method is called in the course of
enablePersistence
, don't we want to report a failure to open the database?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The idea was to let start() proceed if this check failed. I have now changed the code to fail start() (and hence enablePersistence()) if we get an IndexedDbTransactionError and
synchronizeTabs
is false.The fix for this was pretty straightforward, but I ended up changing the callsites to use
this.runTransaction
instead ofthis.simpleDb.runTransaction
, as this allows me to use MockPersistence to inject failures.Note that the behavior of
this.runTransaction
is not all that different: https://github.com/firebase/firebase-js-sdk/blob/master/packages/firestore/src/local/indexeddb_persistence.ts#L808We make one additional call to verify the lease (which succeeds if no other client has exclusive access). We also obtain access to all ObjectStores, but I think that is not all that different since there is no operation that doesn't also access the DbPrimaryStore.