-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 927
Make applyRemoteEvent idempotent #2263
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
schmidt-sebastian
merged 15 commits into
mrschmidt/idempotent
from
mrschmidt/applyremoteevent
Oct 15, 2019
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
15 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
29276cc
Make applyRemoteEvent idempotent
schmidt-sebastian 62a306a
Add onCommitted listeners for transactions
schmidt-sebastian e6b4329
Merge
schmidt-sebastian 351bebb
Add tests
schmidt-sebastian e78cfd5
Add one more unit test
schmidt-sebastian 966a6ba
Add tests
schmidt-sebastian 5a43533
Add one more unit test
schmidt-sebastian 2843d42
Review feedback
schmidt-sebastian 6854745
Add commit count assert
schmidt-sebastian 8714404
Lint fix
schmidt-sebastian 15ad9fc
Merge
schmidt-sebastian 302f15c
Merge
schmidt-sebastian ce7ec28
Merge
schmidt-sebastian 2fdaf4c
Merge branch 'mrschmidt/idempotent' into mrschmidt/applyremoteevent
schmidt-sebastian d0ddeab
Merge branch 'mrschmidt/idempotent' into mrschmidt/applyremoteevent
schmidt-sebastian File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I can't find where this cache is kept now. Unconditionally writing it would be a pretty major regression.
Or is the equivalent supposed to be the
collectionParents
addition inindexeddb_mutation_queue.ts
? This cache ensures that we only ever write a collection parent index entry once for the entire duration of the app. Theindexeddb_mutation_queue.ts
changes ensure uniqueness within a mutation batch, but that's a far lesser benefit.On the whole I think unwinding all of this in the name of idempotency is a bad deal. If we added
transaction.onCommitted
this wouldn't be impacted at all. This is the second case we were looking for--I think it makes sense to pursue that instead of these changes.