Skip to content

Add m161 changelog for functions #6769

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 13, 2025
Merged

Conversation

emilypgoogle
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 13, 2025

📝 PRs merging into main branch

Our main branch should always be in a releasable state. If you are working on a larger change, or if you don't want this change to see the light of the day just yet, consider using a feature branch first, and only merge into the main branch when the code complete and ready to be released.

@google-oss-bot
Copy link
Contributor

google-oss-bot commented Mar 13, 2025

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 13, 2025

Test Results

14 files   -   4  14 suites   - 4   12s ⏱️ ±0s
23 tests  -  62  23 ✅  -  62  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
46 runs   - 124  46 ✅  - 124  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 9788338. ± Comparison against base commit 19dd95b.

This pull request removes 85 and adds 23 tests. Note that renamed tests count towards both.
com.google.firebase.vertexai.GenerativeModelTesting ‑ exception thrown when using invalid location
com.google.firebase.vertexai.GenerativeModelTesting ‑ system calling in request
com.google.firebase.vertexai.SchemaTests ‑ basic schema declaration
com.google.firebase.vertexai.SchemaTests ‑ full schema declaration
com.google.firebase.vertexai.SerializationTests ‑ test Candidate serialization as Json
com.google.firebase.vertexai.SerializationTests ‑ test GenerateContentResponse serialization as Json
com.google.firebase.vertexai.SerializationTests ‑ test Schema serialization as Json
com.google.firebase.vertexai.SerializationTests ‑ test countTokensResponse serialization as Json
com.google.firebase.vertexai.SerializationTests ‑ test modalityTokenCount serialization as Json
com.google.firebase.vertexai.StreamingSnapshotTests ‑ citation parsed correctly
…
com.google.firebase.functions.AppCheckLimitedUseTest ‑ FirebaseFunctions#getHttpsCallable should build callable with FAC settings (when false)
com.google.firebase.functions.AppCheckLimitedUseTest ‑ FirebaseFunctions#getHttpsCallable should build callable with FAC settings (when true)
com.google.firebase.functions.AppCheckLimitedUseTest ‑ FirebaseFunctions#getHttpsCallable should not use limited-use tokens by default
com.google.firebase.functions.AppCheckLimitedUseTest ‑ FirebaseFunctions#getHttpsCallableFromUrl callable with FAC settings (when false)
com.google.firebase.functions.AppCheckLimitedUseTest ‑ FirebaseFunctions#getHttpsCallableFromUrl callable with FAC settings (when true)
com.google.firebase.functions.AppCheckLimitedUseTest ‑ FirebaseFunctions#getHttpsCallableFromUrl should not use limited-use tokens by default
com.google.firebase.functions.FunctionsRegistrarTest ‑ getComponents_publishesLibVersionComponent
com.google.firebase.functions.FunctionsTests ‑ Firebase#functions should delegate to FirebaseFunctions#getInstance(FirebaseApp, region)
com.google.firebase.functions.FunctionsTests ‑ Firebase#functions should delegate to FirebaseFunctions#getInstance(region)
com.google.firebase.functions.FunctionsTests ‑ FirebaseApp#functions should delegate to FirebaseFunctions#getInstance(FirebaseApp)
…

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@google-oss-bot
Copy link
Contributor

google-oss-bot commented Mar 13, 2025

@emilypgoogle emilypgoogle merged commit b9be9f1 into main Mar 13, 2025
32 of 33 checks passed
@emilypgoogle emilypgoogle deleted the ep/m161-functions-changelog branch March 13, 2025 21:16
emilypgoogle added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2025
tejasd pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2025
@firebase firebase locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 13, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants