-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 616
Fix broken code links in comments of SetOptions.java #2162
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Coverage ReportAffected SDKs
Test Logs
NotesHTML coverage reports can be produced locally with Head commit (e90c8661) is created by Prow via merging commits: a9a6b9c d4077de. |
Binary Size ReportAffected SDKsNo changes between base commit (a9a6b9c) and head commit (e90c8661). Test Logs
NotesHead commit (e90c8661) is created by Prow via merging commits: a9a6b9c d4077de. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
SetOptions.java is not the only file mentioned in the bug, please make sure you fix the rest of the issues.
* the {@code set()} calls in {@link DocumentReference}, {@link WriteBatch} and {@link Transaction} | ||
* can be configured to perform granular merges instead of overwriting the target documents in their | ||
* entirety. | ||
* SetOptions objects returned by {@link #merge()}, {@link #mergeFields(List<String>)} and {@link |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think it's valid syntax. it should be something like:
* SetOptions objects returned by {@link #merge()}, {@link #mergeFields(List<String>)} and {@link | |
* SetOptions objects returned by {@link #merge()}, {@link #mergeFields(List)} and {@link |
i.e. without generic parameters.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The original bug does not mention, but I think the other place is DocumentId.java?
* the {@code set()} calls in {@link DocumentReference}, {@link WriteBatch} and {@link Transaction} | ||
* can be configured to perform granular merges instead of overwriting the target documents in their | ||
* entirety. | ||
* SetOptions objects returned by {@link #merge()}, {@link #mergeFields(List<String>)} and {@link |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks
@wu-hui: The following test failed, say
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
No description provided.