-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
feat: tagging jumpstart models #2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: feat/script_mode_for_model_class
Are you sure you want to change the base?
feat: tagging jumpstart models #2
Conversation
0ee6065
to
15f730f
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Few comments:
- tag names
- edge case handling
src/sagemaker/jumpstart/constants.py
Outdated
|
||
|
||
class JumpStartTag(str, Enum): | ||
"""Enum class for tags to apply to JumpStart models.""" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is that the tag key? If yes, can you update the docstring to make it clear please?
src/sagemaker/jumpstart/utils.py
Outdated
inference_script_uri: Optional[str], | ||
) -> List[Dict[str, str]]: | ||
"""Adds tags for JumpStart models. Returns original tags for non-JumpStart | ||
models. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit:
"""Add custom tags to JumpStart models, return the updated tags.
No-op if this is not a JumpStart model related resource.
...
"""
{ | ||
constants.JumpStartTag.INFERENCE_SCRIPT_URI.value: inference_script_uri, | ||
} | ||
) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I know this is an edge case, but could you check that these tags do not already exist, and not add them if that's the case? You would get a validation error if you tried to add two tags with the same key.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good idea
JumpStartTag.INFERENCE_MODEL_URI.value: inference_model_uri, | ||
}, | ||
{JumpStartTag.INFERENCE_SCRIPT_URI.value: inference_script_uri}, | ||
] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
could you please add a unit test for the edge case where these tag keys are requested by the customer?
src/sagemaker/jumpstart/constants.py
Outdated
"""Enum class for tags to apply to JumpStart models.""" | ||
|
||
INFERENCE_MODEL_URI = "jumpstart-inference-model-uri" | ||
INFERENCE_SCRIPT_URI = "jumpstart-inference-script-uri" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
could you use something like: aws-jumpstart-
or aws-smjs-
prefix to make it clear this was added by AWS?
System tags look like aws:
so I would like to be close to this, even though these are not system tags (see tagging).
2f3efa2
to
5cba331
Compare
…gging-jumpstart-models
Issue #, if available:
Description of changes:
Testing done:
Merge Checklist
Put an
x
in the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating the PR. If you're unsure about any of them, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! This is simply a reminder of what we are going to look for before merging your pull request.General
Tests
unique_name_from_base
to create resource names in integ tests (if appropriate)By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.