-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7.6k
Change "neopixel" (Adafruit TM) references to use RGB LED names - compliance #10224
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
👋 Hello SuGlider, we appreciate your contribution to this project! Click to see more instructions ...
Review and merge process you can expect ...
|
Memory usage test (comparing PR against master branch)The table below shows the summary of memory usage change (decrease - increase) in bytes and percentage for each target.
Click to expand the detailed deltas report [usage change in BYTES]
|
hi, this was closed? we would not want to remove the name NEOPIXEL from our board definitions and we can "grant use" for any other purposes. |
Hi @ladyada :) There will be another PR. We are removing it from other boards and have renamed the method in our API. NEOPIXEL definitions will stay for Adafruit boards. Seems improper to call leds "Neopixel" when they are not coming from you, so we decided to clean up a bit. There is a backward compatible define for |
Description of Change
Internal request to remove all references to Trade Mark terms (neopixel).
Documentation, commentaries, symbols and functions were modified.
@ladyada - Please Take a Look and comment. Thanks.
Tests scenarios
CI Only
Related links
None - Internal.