Skip to content

LITTLEFS vs LittleFS #5103

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
Martin-Laclaustra opened this issue Apr 23, 2021 · 3 comments · Fixed by #5396
Closed

LITTLEFS vs LittleFS #5103

Martin-Laclaustra opened this issue Apr 23, 2021 · 3 comments · Fixed by #5396
Milestone

Comments

@Martin-Laclaustra
Copy link

Hardware:

Core Installation version: 2.0.0 alpha
IDE name: Arduino IDE
Computer OS: Linux mint

Description:

LITTLEFS has been included for the new release.
This is just a comment with respect to current implementation:
ESP8266 Arduino core, which adopted it months ago (I know it is an independent project), decided to use camelcase:

#include <LittleFS.h>
LittleFS.openDir(dirname); //Objectname

Here, everything is all-caps:

#include <LITTLEFS.h>
LITTLEFS.openDir(dirname); //Objectname

Would it not be advisable to adopt ESP8266 decision to ease cross-porting of projects between both chips?
Best regards

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jun 22, 2021

[STALE_SET] This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in 14 days if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the Status: Stale Issue is stale stage (outdated/stuck) label Jun 22, 2021
@Martin-Laclaustra
Copy link
Author

It would be nice to receive some opinion on this topic.

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jun 22, 2021

[STALE_CLR] This issue has been removed from the stale queue. Please ensure activity to keep it openin the future.

@stale stale bot removed the Status: Stale Issue is stale stage (outdated/stuck) label Jun 22, 2021
@VojtechBartoska VojtechBartoska added this to the 2.0.0 milestone Jul 14, 2021
me-no-dev added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 16, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants