Skip to content

Added support for NodeMCU dev kit v2 #311

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 24, 2015
Merged

Conversation

andysmithfal
Copy link

No description provided.

@tprochazka
Copy link

This implementation fail at least on Windows by this error during compilation:

c:/users/tomas/appdata/roaming/arduino15/packages/esp8266/tools/xtensa-lx106-elf-gcc/1.20.0-26-gb404fb9/bin/../lib/gcc/xtensa-lx106-elf/4.8.2/../../../../xtensa-lx106-elf/bin/ld.exe: cannot open linker script file {build.flash_ld}: No such file or directory
collect2.exe: error: ld returned 1 exit status
Error compiling.

I added one line with nodemcuv2.build.flash_ld=eagle.flash.4m.ld to the boards.txt and then it works correctly.

But still old version of NodeMCU has several more configuraitons like:

nodemcu.build.spiffs_start=0x100000
nodemcu.build.spiffs_end=0x3FB000
nodemcu.build.spiffs_pagesize=256
nodemcu.build.spiffs_blocksize=8192

Why is not included in V2? Arduino implementation is able to us spiffs?

And also naming is a little bit confusing, because official version for this new module is v 1.0
https://github.com/nodemcu/nodemcu-devkit-v1.0
And old one https://github.com/nodemcu/nodemcu-devkit is v0.9
But almost on every eshop sellers use 2.0 :-(

igrr added a commit that referenced this pull request May 24, 2015
Added support for NodeMCU dev kit v2
@igrr igrr merged commit 454e082 into esp8266:esp8266 May 24, 2015
igrr added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2015
Added support for NodeMCU dev kit v2
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants