-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.4k
support Duration
in Date.range/3
#14172
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
josevalim
merged 11 commits into
elixir-lang:main
from
tfiedlerdejanze:date-range-with-durations
Jan 13, 2025
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
563fd96
support `Duration` in `Date.range/3`
tfiedlerdejanze c0b0dd4
update guard and argument error
tfiedlerdejanze c480baf
support keyword list durations
tfiedlerdejanze a31cead
consolidate t:Date.duration_unit_pair()
tfiedlerdejanze 99c0fab
docs
tfiedlerdejanze 8e0c543
redundant call of __duration__!/1
tfiedlerdejanze ab237e9
unused arg
tfiedlerdejanze 228f1df
improved spec based on comments
tfiedlerdejanze 104d7b9
omit additional ArgumentError for untyped args
tfiedlerdejanze c9279d1
unused args
tfiedlerdejanze 66de751
keep ArgumentError clause for invalid step
tfiedlerdejanze File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this was removed following this comment from @whatyouhide, but a zero step won't be caught by the typesystem so I think we should probably still raise a proper
ArgumentError
in this case, WDYT?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes the zero step yep, good callout
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looking at the basic types an invalid step should be caught by the type system (
pos_integer
,neg_integer
), wouldn't it?However, as it stands it's not consistent as
Date.range(d1, d2, 0)
raises anArgumentError
andDate.range(d1, duration, 0)
raises aFunctionClauseError
.I'll re-add the clauses with the adjusted ArgumentError message
to. Actually limiting it torange/2
andrange/3
range/3
feels right.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
also, how about not matching or guarding durations at all (as we also don't do it in shift/2)? so we'd just have:
and
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These are the "old types" (typespecs), for now AFAIK there is no plan to implement these in the new set-theoretic types.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Perhaps we should clarify this distinction in the docs, I can see how having two type systems can be confusing even if it is just a transition phase.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
oh actually wasn't aware of that distinction! thanks!