Skip to content

feat(lint): Identify explicit tags that don't match inference in lint… #764

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 1, 2017

Conversation

tmcw
Copy link
Member

@tmcw tmcw commented Apr 29, 2017

… stage

This will flag cases where people explicitly document things in JSDoc that don't reflect the code
reality - in many cases, misnamed parameter names in documentation tags.

Fixes #575

@tmcw tmcw requested a review from jfirebaugh April 29, 2017 18:25
@tmcw tmcw force-pushed the report-explicit-not-found-lint branch from 2fba1e6 to d32c16c Compare April 29, 2017 18:38
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.2%) to 96.26% when pulling d32c16c on report-explicit-not-found-lint into 0894cc4 on master.

… stage

This will flag cases where people explicitly document things in JSDoc that don't reflect the code
reality - in many cases, misnamed parameter names in documentation tags.

Fixes #575
@tmcw tmcw force-pushed the report-explicit-not-found-lint branch from d32c16c to e0ef7cc Compare May 1, 2017 15:29
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.1%) to 96.319% when pulling e0ef7cc on report-explicit-not-found-lint into 0894cc4 on master.

@tmcw tmcw merged commit ed5c2a0 into master May 1, 2017
@tmcw tmcw deleted the report-explicit-not-found-lint branch May 1, 2017 18:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants