Function shorthand syntax support?

[bpatram]

I'm running the latest version to date (4.0.0-beta.15).

It seems that when writing functions within an object using the shorthand notation that function does not get placed within its parent class when outputting documentation. See example below:

// myfile.js
import { LayoutView } from 'backbone.marionette';

/**
 * A neat layout view
 * @class BaseLayoutView
 * @augments Marionette.LayoutView
 */
export default LayoutView.extend(
	/** @lends BaseLayoutView.prototype */
	{
		/**
		 * My neat function
		 * @param {string} word your word
		 * @returns {string} your word but one better
		 */
		foo: function(word) {
			return word + 1;
		},
		/**
		 * My neat function
		 * @param {string} word your word
		 * @returns {string} your word but one better
		 */
		bar(word) {
			return word + 1;
		}
	}
)

Output after running: documentation build myfile.js -f html -o docs

Notice how the bar function is not nested under the BaseLayoutView class. This only occurs when using the function shorthand notation.

[bpatram]

It seems like this is still under development or consideration? #649

[tmcw]

Yep, that's the tracking ticket. I'm working on a fix today.

[bpatram]

@tmcw Running off the latest commit 802dc4c seems to have a slightly different, but still incorrect, output. See below (it uses the same code as before):

Notice how bar is now defined twice but yet still not nested under the parent class.

[tmcw]

Ugh, yeah, that's the lends support in action. @jfirebaugh any ideas? I'll dig into this but the lends support and its intention is new to me.

[tmcw]

Scratch that, I think I have a reasonable refactor in place locally.

[bpatram]

@tmcw Seems to be working correctly with your last commit! Thanks so much for the fast turn around! Cheers!