Skip to content

symbolic execution: assumptions just alter the path condition #88

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

tautschnig
Copy link
Collaborator

@kroening kroening self-assigned this May 17, 2016
@tautschnig tautschnig force-pushed the assume-assert-path-cond branch from 982651a to c08d8d8 Compare June 20, 2016 10:12
@tautschnig tautschnig force-pushed the assume-assert-path-cond branch from c08d8d8 to f7fe684 Compare November 5, 2016 22:20
@tautschnig tautschnig force-pushed the assume-assert-path-cond branch 2 times, most recently from 80a76a4 to 23ce273 Compare January 25, 2017 22:12
thk123 pushed a commit to thk123/cbmc that referenced this pull request Apr 3, 2017
At the moment, with arrays we assume all writes are in bounds.

See issue diffblue#88
@forejtv
Copy link
Contributor

forejtv commented Apr 4, 2017

@tautschnig can you rebase, please?

@tautschnig tautschnig force-pushed the assume-assert-path-cond branch 4 times, most recently from 2e2cb5a to 26c1bae Compare April 10, 2017 11:28
@tautschnig tautschnig force-pushed the assume-assert-path-cond branch from 26c1bae to e26cb34 Compare June 8, 2017 06:30
@tautschnig tautschnig assigned tautschnig and unassigned kroening Jul 3, 2017
@tautschnig tautschnig changed the base branch from master to develop August 22, 2017 12:36
smowton pushed a commit to smowton/cbmc that referenced this pull request May 9, 2018
smowton pushed a commit to smowton/cbmc that referenced this pull request May 9, 2018
…ram_dump_PR

Improved HTML dump of GOTO program.
@hannes-steffenhagen-diffblue
Copy link
Contributor

@tautschnig Unless I'm grossly misunderstanding this I believe a form of this behaviour is implemented in modern CBMC. Please LMK if you think this should be reopened.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants