Skip to content

Simplification towards singleton intervals requires single variable #7954

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 12, 2023

Conversation

tautschnig
Copy link
Collaborator

We must not blindly assume that that and in >= C1 && !( >= C2) are the same.

Fixes: #7953

  • Each commit message has a non-empty body, explaining why the change was made.
  • n/a Methods or procedures I have added are documented, following the guidelines provided in CODING_STANDARD.md.
  • n/a The feature or user visible behaviour I have added or modified has been documented in the User Guide in doc/cprover-manual/
  • Regression or unit tests are included, or existing tests cover the modified code (in this case I have detailed which ones those are in the commit message).
  • n/a My commit message includes data points confirming performance improvements (if claimed).
  • My PR is restricted to a single feature or bugfix.
  • n/a White-space or formatting changes outside the feature-related changed lines are in commits of their own.

We must not blindly assume that that <exprA> and <exprB> in
<exprA> >= C1 && !(<exprB> >= C2) are the same.

Fixes: diffblue#7953
@NlightNFotis
Copy link
Contributor

NlightNFotis commented Oct 12, 2023

Oh shoot, did I cause this with #7761 ?

EDIT: Yeah, looks like I did - thanks for the quick fix.

@TGWDB TGWDB enabled auto-merge October 12, 2023 09:49
@TGWDB TGWDB merged commit 16e4cf1 into diffblue:develop Oct 12, 2023
@tautschnig tautschnig deleted the bugfixes/7953-interval-simp branch October 12, 2023 11:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

cbmc misses an error
5 participants