Skip to content

Add CPROVER prefix to memory primitives produced by expr2c #7454

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 23, 2022

Conversation

qinheping
Copy link
Collaborator

Memory primitives __CPROVER_POINTER_OBJECT, __CPROVER_OBJECT_SIZE, and __CPROVER_POINTER_OFFSET converted to C using expr2c are now without __CPROVER prefix, which is not consistent with their usage in C.

Also, history primitives __CPROVER_loop_entry is missing.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 23, 2022

Codecov Report

Base: 78.47% // Head: 78.47% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (954df79) compared to base (78fb718).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #7454   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    78.47%   78.47%           
========================================
  Files         1662     1662           
  Lines       191045   191045           
========================================
  Hits        149931   149931           
  Misses       41114    41114           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/ansi-c/expr2c.cpp 67.88% <ø> (ø)

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@tautschnig tautschnig merged commit d8b1c77 into diffblue:develop Dec 23, 2022
@qinheping qinheping deleted the expr2c branch January 18, 2023 21:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants