-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 274
Remove good_pointer, good_pointer_def #7386
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
173d9e2
to
4292861
Compare
Codecov ReportBase: 78.37% // Head: 78.37% // Increases project coverage by
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #7386 +/- ##
========================================
Coverage 78.37% 78.37%
========================================
Files 1647 1647
Lines 190327 190309 -18
========================================
- Hits 149171 149158 -13
+ Misses 41156 41151 -5
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. ☔ View full report at Codecov. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice cleanup.
good_pointer(ptr) is equivalent to __CPROVER_r_ok(ptr, sizeof(*ptr)).
4292861
to
6d59ba9
Compare
Where is Looking at the other PR #7395 where you added a
|
This is currently done in
Correct.
I'd argue it's an improvement: I don't know why |
good_pointer(ptr) is equivalent to __CPROVER_r_ok(ptr, sizeof(*ptr)).