Skip to content

goto-instrument --unwind: identify loop unwinding assertions as such #7262

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

tautschnig
Copy link
Collaborator

We previously generated an assertion without setting either comments or the property class. Make sure verification reports allow the user to understand what the failing/succeeding assertion is about.

  • Each commit message has a non-empty body, explaining why the change was made.
  • n/a Methods or procedures I have added are documented, following the guidelines provided in CODING_STANDARD.md.
  • n/a The feature or user visible behaviour I have added or modified has been documented in the User Guide in doc/cprover-manual/
  • Regression or unit tests are included, or existing tests cover the modified code (in this case I have detailed which ones those are in the commit message).
  • n/a My commit message includes data points confirming performance improvements (if claimed).
  • My PR is restricted to a single feature or bugfix.
  • n/a White-space or formatting changes outside the feature-related changed lines are in commits of their own.

We previously generated an assertion without setting either comments or
the property class. Make sure verification reports allow the user to
understand what the failing/succeeding assertion is about.
@tautschnig tautschnig assigned tautschnig and unassigned kroening Oct 20, 2022
@tautschnig tautschnig merged commit 22c547a into diffblue:develop Oct 20, 2022
@tautschnig tautschnig deleted the feature/goto-instrument-unwind-id branch October 20, 2022 14:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants