Replace the goto_check indirection by direct use of goto_check_c [blocks: #6688]

[tautschnig]

All existing calls necessarily end up calling goto_check_c.

• Each commit message has a non-empty body, explaining why the change was made.
• n/a Methods or procedures I have added are documented, following the guidelines provided in CODING_STANDARD.md.
• n/a The feature or user visible behaviour I have added or modified has been documented in the User Guide in doc/cprover-manual/
• Regression or unit tests are included, or existing tests cover the modified code (in this case I have detailed which ones those are in the commit message).
• n/a My commit message includes data points confirming performance improvements (if claimed).
• My PR is restricted to a single feature or bugfix.
• n/a White-space or formatting changes outside the feature-related changed lines are in commits of their own.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #6716 (64aeff2) into develop (4daadad) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #6716   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    76.79%   76.80%           
========================================
  Files         1589     1589           
  Lines       183667   183656   -11     
========================================
- Hits        141056   141053    -3     
+ Misses       42611    42603    -8     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
.../goto-instrument/accelerate/acceleration_utils.cpp	2.22% <ø> (ø)
src/goto-programs/goto_check.cpp	100.00% <ø> (+18.60%)	⬆️
.../goto-instrument/goto_instrument_parse_options.cpp	69.39% <100.00%> (ø)
src/goto-programs/process_goto_program.cpp	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update daa7996...64aeff2. Read the comment docs.