Skip to content

Support labels in unwindset/function-pointer-restrictions #6508

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 8, 2021

Conversation

tautschnig
Copy link
Collaborator

  • Each commit message has a non-empty body, explaining why the change was made.
  • n/a Methods or procedures I have added are documented, following the guidelines provided in CODING_STANDARD.md.
  • The feature or user visible behaviour I have added or modified has been documented in the User Guide in doc/cprover-manual/
  • Regression or unit tests are included, or existing tests cover the modified code (in this case I have detailed which ones those are in the commit message).
  • n/a My commit message includes data points confirming performance improvements (if claimed).
  • My PR is restricted to a single feature or bugfix.
  • n/a White-space or formatting changes outside the feature-related changed lines are in commits of their own.

We silently accepted unwindset specifications that included non-existent
loop identifiers.
Labels can enable a more stable loop identification when code bases are
subject to change.
Function pointer indexes may change as code is modified. Labelling
function calls provides for a more stable way of referencing.

Fixes: diffblue#6464
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 7, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #6508 (771a153) into develop (6f7c25f) will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 89.71%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #6508      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    76.10%   76.12%   +0.01%     
===========================================
  Files         1548     1548              
  Lines       166326   166378      +52     
===========================================
+ Hits        126587   126653      +66     
+ Misses       39739    39725      -14     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...-checker/single_loop_incremental_symex_checker.cpp 90.47% <ø> (ø)
src/goto-checker/single_path_symex_only_checker.h 100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/goto-checker/symex_bmc.h 100.00% <ø> (ø)
...rc/goto-checker/symex_bmc_incremental_one_loop.cpp 94.33% <ø> (ø)
src/goto-checker/symex_bmc_incremental_one_loop.h 0.00% <ø> (ø)
src/goto-diff/goto_diff_parse_options.cpp 58.02% <0.00%> (-1.03%) ⬇️
src/goto-diff/goto_diff_parse_options.h 100.00% <ø> (ø)
...rc/goto-instrument/goto_instrument_parse_options.h 100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/goto-programs/restrict_function_pointers.h 100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/goto-instrument/unwindset.cpp 89.77% <85.18%> (+4.99%) ⬆️
... and 15 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c05708c...771a153. Read the comment docs.

@tautschnig tautschnig marked this pull request as ready for review December 8, 2021 00:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants