Skip to content

Fix distance check in overflow checking of left shift #6186

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 18, 2021

Conversation

tautschnig
Copy link
Collaborator

The code wrongly compared the shift operand when checking against
negative shifts.

  • Each commit message has a non-empty body, explaining why the change was made.
  • n/a Methods or procedures I have added are documented, following the guidelines provided in CODING_STANDARD.md.
  • n/a The feature or user visible behaviour I have added or modified has been documented in the User Guide in doc/cprover-manual/
  • Regression or unit tests are included, or existing tests cover the modified code (in this case I have detailed which ones those are in the commit message).
  • n/a My commit message includes data points confirming performance improvements (if claimed).
  • My PR is restricted to a single feature or bugfix.
  • n/a White-space or formatting changes outside the feature-related changed lines are in commits of their own.

@tautschnig tautschnig force-pushed the overflow-check branch 2 times, most recently from ec75d1d to a54426c Compare June 18, 2021 09:29
Copy link
Collaborator

@martin-cs martin-cs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes; we need this.

@@ -777,8 +777,10 @@ void goto_checkt::integer_overflow_check(
if(distance_type.id() == ID_unsignedbv)
neg_dist_shift = false_exprt();
else
neg_dist_shift =
binary_relation_exprt(op, ID_lt, from_integer(0, distance_type));
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

😱 oops.

The code wrongly compared the shift operand when checking against
negative shifts.
@tautschnig tautschnig self-assigned this Jun 18, 2021
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 18, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #6186 (3d7b953) into develop (0002950) will increase coverage by 7.92%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #6186      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    67.40%   75.33%   +7.92%     
===========================================
  Files         1157     1454     +297     
  Lines        95236   160922   +65686     
===========================================
+ Hits         64197   121225   +57028     
- Misses       31039    39697    +8658     
Flag Coverage Δ
cproversmt2 ?
regression ?
unit ?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/goto-programs/link_goto_model.cpp 0.00% <0.00%> (-80.86%) ⬇️
src/util/string_container.cpp 52.94% <0.00%> (-47.06%) ⬇️
src/solvers/prop/prop.cpp 42.85% <0.00%> (-41.76%) ⬇️
src/solvers/flattening/boolbv_member.cpp 53.65% <0.00%> (-38.65%) ⬇️
src/cpp/cpp_storage_spec.cpp 65.00% <0.00%> (-35.00%) ⬇️
src/util/cmdline.h 66.66% <0.00%> (-33.34%) ⬇️
src/solvers/strings/array_pool.h 66.66% <0.00%> (-33.34%) ⬇️
src/solvers/strings/string_refinement.h 66.66% <0.00%> (-33.34%) ⬇️
...rs/strings/string_concatenation_builtin_function.h 0.00% <0.00%> (-33.34%) ⬇️
src/ansi-c/literals/convert_character_literal.cpp 33.33% <0.00%> (-32.46%) ⬇️
... and 1433 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 0ae6010...3d7b953. Read the comment docs.

@tautschnig tautschnig merged commit 2e3ba57 into diffblue:develop Jun 18, 2021
@tautschnig tautschnig deleted the overflow-check branch June 18, 2021 12:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants