Skip to content

Remove string operations handled by models from string solver #5065

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

danpoe
Copy link
Contributor

@danpoe danpoe commented Aug 28, 2019

  • Each commit message has a non-empty body, explaining why the change was made.
  • n/a Methods or procedures I have added are documented, following the guidelines provided in CODING_STANDARD.md.
  • n/a The feature or user visible behaviour I have added or modified has been documented in the User Guide in doc/cprover-manual/
  • Regression or unit tests are included, or existing tests cover the modified code (in this case I have detailed which ones those are in the commit message).
  • n/a My commit message includes data points confirming performance improvements (if claimed).
  • My PR is restricted to a single feature or bugfix.
  • n/a White-space or formatting changes outside the feature-related changed lines are in commits of their own.

@danpoe danpoe force-pushed the refactor/remove-string-operations-handled-by-models branch from d08c8c6 to d7963b9 Compare August 29, 2019 10:36
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Aug 29, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #5065 into develop will decrease coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #5065      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    69.69%   69.68%   -0.01%     
===========================================
  Files         1321     1321              
  Lines       109360   109331      -29     
===========================================
- Hits         76219    76190      -29     
  Misses       33141    33141
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...rs/strings/string_constraint_generator_valueof.cpp 80.6% <ø> (-1.03%) ⬇️
...c/java_bytecode/java_string_library_preprocess.cpp 96.81% <ø> (-0.08%) ⬇️
...lvers/strings/string_constraint_generator_main.cpp 84.48% <ø> (-0.35%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update fab409d...48de77e. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Contributor

@allredj allredj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✔️
Passed Diffblue compatibility checks (cbmc commit: d7963b9).
Build URL: https://travis-ci.com/diffblue/test-gen/builds/125067466

@danpoe danpoe force-pushed the refactor/remove-string-operations-handled-by-models branch from d7963b9 to 21ee1e8 Compare August 30, 2019 09:45
Copy link
Contributor

@allredj allredj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✔️
Passed Diffblue compatibility checks (cbmc commit: 21ee1e8).
Build URL: https://travis-ci.com/diffblue/test-gen/builds/125215224

@danpoe danpoe force-pushed the refactor/remove-string-operations-handled-by-models branch 3 times, most recently from 1000a9e to 621478e Compare September 9, 2019 13:09
Copy link
Contributor

@allredj allredj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️
This PR failed Diffblue compatibility checks (cbmc commit: 1000a9e).
Build URL: https://travis-ci.com/diffblue/test-gen/builds/126450199
Status will be re-evaluated on next push.
Common spurious failures include: the cbmc commit has disappeared in the mean time (e.g. in a force-push); the author is not in the list of contributors (e.g. first-time contributors); compatibility was already broken by an earlier merge.

Copy link
Contributor

@allredj allredj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✔️
Passed Diffblue compatibility checks (cbmc commit: 621478e).
Build URL: https://travis-ci.com/diffblue/test-gen/builds/126458601

@danpoe danpoe force-pushed the refactor/remove-string-operations-handled-by-models branch from 621478e to 48de77e Compare September 11, 2019 10:10
The test previously passed by accident as it did not specify the models jar via
the classpath option of jbmc. Thus, the models were not loaded and the string
operations were nondet'ed, and verification failed as required by the test.
Copy link
Contributor

@allredj allredj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✔️
Passed Diffblue compatibility checks (cbmc commit: 48de77e).
Build URL: https://travis-ci.com/diffblue/test-gen/builds/126974176

@danpoe danpoe merged commit 57de946 into diffblue:develop Sep 12, 2019
@danpoe danpoe deleted the refactor/remove-string-operations-handled-by-models branch June 2, 2020 17:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants