Skip to content

Tidy up cmake commands for coverage #5046

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

owen-mc-diffblue
Copy link
Contributor

These commands are equivalent

  • Each commit message has a non-empty body, explaining why the change was made.
  • Methods or procedures I have added are documented, following the guidelines provided in CODING_STANDARD.md.
  • The feature or user visible behaviour I have added or modified has been documented in the User Guide in doc/cprover-manual/
  • Regression or unit tests are included, or existing tests cover the modified code (in this case I have detailed which ones those are in the commit message).
  • My commit message includes data points confirming performance improvements (if claimed).
  • My PR is restricted to a single feature or bugfix.
  • White-space or formatting changes outside the feature-related changed lines are in commits of their own.

These commands are equivalent
@owen-mc-diffblue owen-mc-diffblue force-pushed the owen/tidy-up-coverage-cmake-file branch from 042b7b1 to 0894e96 Compare August 27, 2019 09:12
@owen-mc-diffblue owen-mc-diffblue marked this pull request as ready for review August 27, 2019 10:34
Copy link
Contributor

@allredj allredj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✔️
Passed Diffblue compatibility checks (cbmc commit: 0894e96).
Build URL: https://travis-ci.com/diffblue/test-gen/builds/124720233

@owen-mc-diffblue owen-mc-diffblue merged commit 2953f43 into diffblue:develop Aug 27, 2019
@owen-mc-diffblue owen-mc-diffblue deleted the owen/tidy-up-coverage-cmake-file branch August 27, 2019 14:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants