Skip to content

Java bytecode conversion: inline or move temporaries #4532

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 15, 2019

Conversation

tautschnig
Copy link
Collaborator

This is a cleanup follow-up to #4524 of various minor bits that I spotted while doing the review thereof.

  • Each commit message has a non-empty body, explaining why the change was made.
  • n/a Methods or procedures I have added are documented, following the guidelines provided in CODING_STANDARD.md.
  • n/a The feature or user visible behaviour I have added or modified has been documented in the User Guide in doc/cprover-manual/
  • Regression or unit tests are included, or existing tests cover the modified code (in this case I have detailed which ones those are in the commit message).
  • n/a My commit message includes data points confirming performance improvements (if claimed).
  • My PR is restricted to a single feature or bugfix.
  • n/a White-space or formatting changes outside the feature-related changed lines are in commits of their own.

symbolt::symbol_expr returns and expression by value.
This avoids constructing short-lived temporary objects where their names
don't add value either.
This simplifies the code and helps getting rid of some more temporaries.
Copy link
Contributor

@allredj allredj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✔️
Passed Diffblue compatibility checks (cbmc commit: 1e9d135).
Build URL: https://travis-ci.com/diffblue/test-gen/builds/108242344

@tautschnig tautschnig merged commit 18459ef into diffblue:develop Apr 15, 2019
@tautschnig tautschnig deleted the 4524-follow-up branch April 15, 2019 12:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants