Skip to content

Ensure typet constructor is always compatible with GCC 5's STL [blocks: #4458] #4460

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 30, 2019

Conversation

tautschnig
Copy link
Collaborator

When enabling NAMED_SUB_IS_FORWARD_LIST, compilation failed as the
std::forward_list constructors shipped with GCC 5 do not support an
empty initializer list. GCC 6 and later do not have any such problem.

  • Each commit message has a non-empty body, explaining why the change was made.
  • n/a Methods or procedures I have added are documented, following the guidelines provided in CODING_STANDARD.md.
  • n/a The feature or user visible behaviour I have added or modified has been documented in the User Guide in doc/cprover-manual/
  • Regression or unit tests are included, or existing tests cover the modified code (in this case I have detailed which ones those are in the commit message).
  • n/a My commit message includes data points confirming performance improvements (if claimed).
  • My PR is restricted to a single feature or bugfix.
  • n/a White-space or formatting changes outside the feature-related changed lines are in commits of their own.

@tautschnig tautschnig changed the title Ensure typet constructor is always compatible with GCC 5's STL Ensure typet constructor is always compatible with GCC 5's STL [blocks: #4458] Mar 30, 2019
typet(irep_idt _id, typet _subtype)
: irept(std::move(_id), {}, {std::move(_subtype)})
{
}
#else
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note this will also be used under Clang, which pretends to be gcc 4.2.1

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, thanks a lot, I've added #defined(__clang__) to the above #if.

When enabling NAMED_SUB_IS_FORWARD_LIST, compilation failed as the
std::forward_list constructors shipped with GCC 5 do not support an
empty initializer list. GCC 6 and later do not have any such problem.
@tautschnig tautschnig self-assigned this Mar 30, 2019
@tautschnig tautschnig merged commit d460249 into diffblue:develop Mar 30, 2019
@tautschnig tautschnig deleted the constructor-fix branch March 30, 2019 12:35
Copy link
Contributor

@allredj allredj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✔️
Passed Diffblue compatibility checks (cbmc commit: ca155d3).
Build URL: https://travis-ci.com/diffblue/test-gen/builds/106425825

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants