Mark the two failing bugs in regressions/goto-analyzer as KNOWNBUG #432
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The two tests that fail appear to be real bugs as the conditions appear to be sufficient to conclude the assertion. I also added this folder to the regressions that get run since excluding these two the remainder pass.
thk123
changed the title
peterschrammel
approved these changes
Jan 13, 2017
|
@peterschrammel @martin-cs I have created the issue as I wrote it above, feel free to edit it if not correct: #437 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The two tests that fail appear to be real bugs as the conditions appear to be sufficient to conclude the assertion. I also added this folder to the regressions that get run since excluding these two the remainder
pass.
I shall create an issue for this, but if someone with more knowledge could confirm that my assessment that a) this should work and b) my suggested issue is correct that would be useful.
I have also added this folder to the regressions that get run by the CI.
Proposed Issue
The intervals analysis of goto-analyze doesn't work for intervals2 and intervals4. Both of these use && in an assertion that should be knowable.