Skip to content

Consider properties of inline functions #4260

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

peterschrammel
Copy link
Member

Properties in inline functions used to be discarded because we ran partial_inline. However, since we do not run partial_inline anymore, properties in inline functions would be completely ignored without this fix.

  • Each commit message has a non-empty body, explaining why the change was made.
  • Methods or procedures I have added are documented, following the guidelines provided in CODING_STANDARD.md.
  • The feature or user visible behaviour I have added or modified has been documented in the User Guide in doc/cprover-manual/
  • Regression or unit tests are included, or existing tests cover the modified code (in this case I have detailed which ones those are in the commit message).
  • My commit message includes data points confirming performance improvements (if claimed).
  • My PR is restricted to a single feature or bugfix.
  • White-space or formatting changes outside the feature-related changed lines are in commits of their own.

Copy link
Collaborator

@tautschnig tautschnig left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It looks like I should have done a better job in #3308... Approving, but note that CI is failing.

Properties in inline functions used to be ignored
because we ran partial_inline to inline them.
Since we are not doing that anymore, properties
in inline functions have been ignored without this fix.
Inline functions are handled as any other functions now
@peterschrammel peterschrammel force-pushed the fix-set-properties-inline branch from ee51719 to ffd6d38 Compare March 3, 2019 20:47
Copy link
Contributor

@allredj allredj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️
This PR failed Diffblue compatibility checks (cbmc commit: ffd6d38).
Build URL: https://travis-ci.com/diffblue/test-gen/builds/102967269
Status will be re-evaluated on next push.
Common spurious failures:

  • the cbmc commit has disappeared in the mean time (e.g. in a force-push)

  • the author is not in the list of contributors (e.g. first-time contributors).

  • the compatibility was already broken by an earlier merge.

@tautschnig tautschnig merged commit 141223a into diffblue:develop Mar 3, 2019
@peterschrammel peterschrammel deleted the fix-set-properties-inline branch March 3, 2019 21:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants